» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
I think everyone agrees with me, that the still standing families are the winners of this version, but who? or is the whole "pact" the winner of this version?
Here a list of a counts per family of involved wars:
I just counted all the involved wars, i didn't made a selection between big, small or normals wars.
Marangello - 19 wars
Quirites - 16 wars
Vincitori - 13 wars
Conflict - 12 wars
Liberta - 12 wars
Presidential - 6 wars (had most wars last version!)
Righelli - 5 wars
Here a list of a counts per family of involved wars:
I just counted all the involved wars, i didn't made a selection between big, small or normals wars.
Marangello - 19 wars
Quirites - 16 wars
Vincitori - 13 wars
Conflict - 12 wars
Liberta - 12 wars
Presidential - 6 wars (had most wars last version!)
Righelli - 5 wars
poll
Anonymous (23:59:14 - 03-04)
one thing only !!
liberta in this version defended all theyr blood to the end !!! never sold noone and never will !!
not many fams did that !!
so i am proud to be there !!!
liberta in this version defended all theyr blood to the end !!! never sold noone and never will !!
not many fams did that !!
so i am proud to be there !!!
Anonymous at 18:42:42 on 03/04:
Difference is, those fams were from the pure size Top 8 fams to begin with. So to just call it a small bloodlist because those were just 6 fams is bullshit.
So according to eviL's logic 6 fams with a total of roughly 1500 accounts is less pussy play
than a 10 fam pact with 1000 accounts :') Welcome to eviL's world.
abcd at 17:49:02 on 03/04:
6 bloods*
eviL at 15:13:40 on 03/04:
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
bullshit at 14:17:24 on 03/04:
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
6 bloods*
Difference is, those fams were from the pure size Top 8 fams to begin with. So to just call it a small bloodlist because those were just 6 fams is bullshit.
So according to eviL's logic 6 fams with a total of roughly 1500 accounts is less pussy play
than a 10 fam pact with 1000 accounts :') Welcome to eviL's world.
lol ever heard of this new feature called lackeys ? there where 850 brug+ to kill on our bot during "War vs Pact" alone, now add the accounts of yidigos/blacksea and krays/marazz wars a couple of days prior to that one and you know comparing numbers from 2.4 with 3.3 is simply retarded -_-
Anonymous (18:42:42 - 03-04)
abcd at 17:49:02 on 03/04:
6 bloods*
eviL at 15:13:40 on 03/04:
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
bullshit at 14:17:24 on 03/04:
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
6 bloods*
Difference is, those fams were from the pure size Top 8 fams to begin with. So to just call it a small bloodlist because those were just 6 fams is bullshit.
So according to eviL's logic 6 fams with a total of roughly 1500 accounts is less pussy play
than a 10 fam pact with 1000 accounts :') Welcome to eviL's world.
abcd (17:49:02 - 03-04)
eviL at 15:13:40 on 03/04:
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
bullshit at 14:17:24 on 03/04:
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
6 bloods*
Sbanks-lemobile (16:15:04 - 03-04)
eviL at 12:49:25 on 03/04:
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
sbanks-lemobile at 18:36:17 on 02/04:
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
eviL at 16:19:06 on 02/04:
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
Yes i know about that, some families dont like to be named in articles, they think they will be a target for others Then. Or dont want the credit for being a shooter. Etc etc.
We as reporters dont know everything whats Going on ofcourse, and we mostly only add families to the involved list when we recieve witness statements or see bf kills
But its Only logical Vinci conflict marangello quirites got the same ammount of wars, as they worked together nicely this version
Anonymous (15:53:09 - 03-04)
dont know what u guys are talking, but its clear winners of the version Liberta+Violenza
Battalgazi at 15:22:46 on 03/04:
mate, we all know that liberta shot like as hell , and didnt countered for some reasons and safed their brug++ members till the end , and its an achievement for sure. thats why i consider them as the winner. (kill enemies + help bloods + #1 at the end of the version = goal )
And i also want to remind you something , liberta helped you guys when needed , if they wanted to hug till the end , we would probably manage to kill marangello ( liberta shot many targets from marazzino)
eviL at 12:49:25 on 03/04:
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
sbanks-lemobile at 18:36:17 on 02/04:
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
eviL at 16:19:06 on 02/04:
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
mate, we all know that liberta shot like as hell , and didnt countered for some reasons and safed their brug++ members till the end , and its an achievement for sure. thats why i consider them as the winner. (kill enemies + help bloods + #1 at the end of the version = goal )
And i also want to remind you something , liberta helped you guys when needed , if they wanted to hug till the end , we would probably manage to kill marangello ( liberta shot many targets from marazzino)
Comon dude no disrespecting Liberta/Tremps, but we all know they recruited about every possible fam that went down this version ... That massive recruiting and suicides from reranked accounts even made Guantanamo change their name. So yeah Liberta/Tremps are the winners, just as much as Conflict/Vinci/Maran/Righ/Quiri but don't gimme that shit they are winners because of the brugs they had left, cause half of em weren't even Liberta/Tremps from the start
Battalgazi at 15:22:46 on 03/04:
mate, we all know that liberta shot like as hell , and didnt countered for some reasons and safed their brug++ members till the end , and its an achievement for sure. thats why i consider them as the winner. (kill enemies + help bloods + #1 at the end of the version = goal )
And i also want to remind you something , liberta helped you guys when needed , if they wanted to hug till the end , we would probably manage to kill marangello ( liberta shot many targets from marazzino)
eviL at 12:49:25 on 03/04:
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
sbanks-lemobile at 18:36:17 on 02/04:
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
eviL at 16:19:06 on 02/04:
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
mate, we all know that liberta shot like as hell , and didnt countered for some reasons and safed their brug++ members till the end , and its an achievement for sure. thats why i consider them as the winner. (kill enemies + help bloods + #1 at the end of the version = goal )
And i also want to remind you something , liberta helped you guys when needed , if they wanted to hug till the end , we would probably manage to kill marangello ( liberta shot many targets from marazzino)
did i say the contrary ? Liberta is as much winner as the other fams, what i dont agree is your way of judging a winner, if i can pick i rather fight 50 wars and end up with 10 brugs, then fighting 10 and ending up with 200 brugs. Dont talk like im putting down Liberta's work, im putting everyone in the same level, ones shot a bit more, others got shot a bit more, and others helped a bit more cause they were fortunate not to be hit as much, all those fams are winners, equally. We all know why your always bragging Liberta since the day you died xD
eviL at 12:49:25 on 03/04:
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
sbanks-lemobile at 18:36:17 on 02/04:
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
eviL at 16:19:06 on 02/04:
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
mate, we all know that liberta shot like as hell , and didnt countered for some reasons and safed their brug++ members till the end , and its an achievement for sure. thats why i consider them as the winner. (kill enemies + help bloods + #1 at the end of the version = goal )
And i also want to remind you something , liberta helped you guys when needed , if they wanted to hug till the end , we would probably manage to kill marangello ( liberta shot many targets from marazzino)
bullshit at 14:17:24 on 03/04:
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
you can call it whatever you like, each of those fams had 4/5 bloods, and shot with eachother, and did 90% of the wars this version since day 1, if you call that hugging, what do you call to the fams that did no war and got killed by this fams ? Thats the hugging, you can dislike this fams, its your own right, but you cant call huggers to the fams that did all the wars. And yes we had alot of amusement shooting everyone. Im sure next time other fams will have amusement shooting us, with even a bigger gathering of fams, the only difference is when that happens you wont call it pussypact, you will call it good bloods.
bullshit (14:17:24 - 03-04)
whats the difference between huge pussypact on 2.4 and combomixedgaypact on 3.3???
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
fams count?(its limited)
unoffical?(they dont deny it here)
if its not hugging mental what is it? what kind of amusement you have ?
Deston at 04:18:25 on 03/04:
I just wanna say that Gravano lost, being the only pact family to die... Sleepy bitches! <3
I just wanna say that Gravano lost, being the only pact family to die... Sleepy bitches! <3
Cuz of you i didnt vote presi up there xDDD amkkkk <3
phenkyhenky at 12:06:15 on 03/04:
come on what u talking about guys everybody can say what they thinks their ideas etc u dont need to discuss all just answer who says bad things about u or your fams.. or make kidding
cuz if needed i can also tell , say so many but not needed..
we are still here u are also just thanx the fams who finish the game together was good job o/
now look the next vers.. and wish luck all
come on what u talking about guys everybody can say what they thinks their ideas etc u dont need to discuss all just answer who says bad things about u or your fams.. or make kidding
cuz if needed i can also tell , say so many but not needed..
we are still here u are also just thanx the fams who finish the game together was good job o/
now look the next vers.. and wish luck all
:O
WTH
A post where Phenky doesn't insult anyone :o
Pay attention to my words, World is near its end, yes it is
Anyway was a funny version, where the major winner was Brando with all the DC money gathered.
Anonymous (13:01:20 - 03-04)
Marangello - 19 wars
Quirites - 16 wars
Vincitori - 13 wars
Conflict - 12 wars
winners
Quirites - 16 wars
Vincitori - 13 wars
Conflict - 12 wars
winners
sbanks-lemobile at 18:36:17 on 02/04:
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
eviL at 16:19:06 on 02/04:
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
im not even gonna count number of wars, i dont think those numbers are correct, some fams shot in some wars and lost noone, so i doubt sbanks got the numbers correct, but picking out 1 winner is just stupid, every fam that is still alive desearve the victory.
If you dont tell me you are in, or we dont find out you are in, you aint in. Thats my logical. If you want to brag at the end of the version you were involved in many more.. Unlucky xd
im not bragging sbanks, i had a quick look on war's (i know in which wars conflict was in shooting much or less according to the state of the version and the condition we were in) and conflict was in 15/16 wars, some of them specially after we got targeted we shot only with the surviving strong accounts so didnt lose anyone, doesnt mean we didnt participate in. But Conflict is not the problem, 12 or 14 or 16 wars, who cares, tho Presidential and Righelli shot in every war in which any of our fams got attacked, plus in many of the ones we attacked, so counting 5 and 6 wars for them is @ the minimum odd.
Battalgazi if thats how you pick a winner i respect your opinion, cant say im surprised on the standards you would use to pick a winner, being top of marazzino im not surprised that you say things like it doesnt matter how much you shot, what it matters is the number of brugs you have in the end, that seems kinda hugging mentality, but im sure im wrong !
Anyways whoever had fun is winner, congratz to the fams that finish the version, congratz to the fams that died few time ago, i consider gravano, bruinsma and hangover as much winners as the ones left alive. And thx to our enemies for the always entertaining wars. as long as we have fun shooting, either we survive or die its secondary
Anonymous (12:11:10 - 03-04)
hahaha at 03:33:22 on 03/04:
Congrats conflict and marangello for being the largest families / fastest rankers of the version, too bad in this lackey run day and age that means little to piss.
Fun Fact #4928 In v1.9 people didn't suicide as often past mobster rank, and the higher ranks and families had much more respect as it was much harder to achieve back then.
Of course it didn't pay the owners as much back then so, all in the name of modern industry and the do$$ar bi$$. o/
Anonymous at 01:47:30 on 03/04:
fun fact, Conflict was the 1st fam to reach level 25, and only Conflict and Marangello reached level 25.
fun fact, Conflict was the 1st fam to reach level 25, and only Conflict and Marangello reached level 25.
Congrats conflict and marangello for being the largest families / fastest rankers of the version, too bad in this lackey run day and age that means little to piss.
Fun Fact #4928 In v1.9 people didn't suicide as often past mobster rank, and the higher ranks and families had much more respect as it was much harder to achieve back then.
Of course it didn't pay the owners as much back then so, all in the name of modern industry and the do$$ar bi$$. o/
ReBorN at 11:51:06 on 03/04:
You have got to be kidding right? Just because you have the highest worth and/or highest amount of Brugs at the end of the version does not mean you are the winner, it just means you hug the most.
The true winner is determined by the family that impacted the version the most, the family that was feared the most, the family that was involved in the most wars, the family that inflicted the most damage. Did anyone ever really fear Liberta this version (or any version for that matter)? I doubt it. I'm sure the pact didn't fear you guys.
There are two reasons Liberta grew as big as they did in this version:
1) Bloodship to the pact
2) Gathering families to join your own pact.
And it seems the only reason for #2 was to attempt to declare yourselves the winners at the end of the version.
When people start judging the winner by who is the largest at the end of the version over who actually controlled the version really signals the end of this game.
PS - The self-proclaimed winners (Liberta) only have 4 votes in this player-based poll ;)
Battalgazi at 08:45:10 on 03/04:
jealous liberta? :D
eviL at 16:17:22 on 02/04:
lol
Battalgazi at 13:55:52 on 02/04:
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
lol
jealous liberta? :D
You have got to be kidding right? Just because you have the highest worth and/or highest amount of Brugs at the end of the version does not mean you are the winner, it just means you hug the most.
The true winner is determined by the family that impacted the version the most, the family that was feared the most, the family that was involved in the most wars, the family that inflicted the most damage. Did anyone ever really fear Liberta this version (or any version for that matter)? I doubt it. I'm sure the pact didn't fear you guys.
There are two reasons Liberta grew as big as they did in this version:
1) Bloodship to the pact
2) Gathering families to join your own pact.
And it seems the only reason for #2 was to attempt to declare yourselves the winners at the end of the version.
When people start judging the winner by who is the largest at the end of the version over who actually controlled the version really signals the end of this game.
PS - The self-proclaimed winners (Liberta) only have 4 votes in this player-based poll ;)
come on what u talking about guys everybody can say what they thinks their ideas etc u dont need to discuss all just answer who says bad things about u or your fams.. or make kidding
cuz if needed i can also tell , say so many but not needed..
we are still here u are also just thanx the fams who finish the game together was good job o/
now look the next vers.. and wish luck all
Battalgazi at 08:45:10 on 03/04:
jealous liberta? :D
eviL at 16:17:22 on 02/04:
lol
Battalgazi at 13:55:52 on 02/04:
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
lol
jealous liberta? :D
You have got to be kidding right? Just because you have the highest worth and/or highest amount of Brugs at the end of the version does not mean you are the winner, it just means you hug the most.
The true winner is determined by the family that impacted the version the most, the family that was feared the most, the family that was involved in the most wars, the family that inflicted the most damage. Did anyone ever really fear Liberta this version (or any version for that matter)? I doubt it. I'm sure the pact didn't fear you guys.
There are two reasons Liberta grew as big as they did in this version:
1) Bloodship to the pact
2) Gathering families to join your own pact.
And it seems the only reason for #2 was to attempt to declare yourselves the winners at the end of the version.
When people start judging the winner by who is the largest at the end of the version over who actually controlled the version really signals the end of this game.
PS - The self-proclaimed winners (Liberta) only have 4 votes in this player-based poll ;)
Battalgazi at 08:45:10 on 03/04:
jealous liberta? :D
eviL at 16:17:22 on 02/04:
lol
Battalgazi at 13:55:52 on 02/04:
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
Liberta co has more than 4000 points which means they are the winner.
its not important how many wars you involved , its important how many targets you killed and how many brug++ you have got at the and of the version.
lol
jealous liberta? :D
Jealous of adding random fams into your alliance?
What I do know is that the lackey part creates way to many people with strong accounts who don't even know what it means to really rank. With that it also creates to many loose cannons(individual aswell families) because it doesn't matter if you die, just buy some new dc's put on lackeys wait a couple of weeks and we have ourself a new brug account. Fams and person are not challenged anymore to think about there action(s) as it's way to easy to get to brug levels. Also to many players who really don't have a clue how for example playing a fam works(rules etc) just get brug be a big noob and don't care bout the consequence, you can get brug again without any effort.
So basicly stop with the lackeys and let the real players get this game back not the ones who pay(real money) the most.